Digital Phone / Cable Telephony
Most cable companies have launched Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) phone service, or digital phone service, providing consumers a true alternative to standard telephone service.
Filings
Recent Filings
2/15/2008
NCTA Opposition 02/15/08
Email this Document
Abstract: NCTA Opposition re Telephone Number Requirements for IP-Enabled Service Providers, opposing the requested clarification and urges the FCC to retain the existing "four fields" requirement; WC Docket No. 07-243 et al.Attachment: 021508 07-243 et al comments.pdf (21 KB)Publication Type: Regulatory Filing
7/27/2007
NCTA Letter 07/27/07Email this Document
Abstract: NCTA Letter re: IP-Enabled Services, urging the FCC to reject AT&T's arguments that is video offering is not a "cable service" delivered over a "cable system"; WC Docket No. 04-36Attachment: 072707 04-36 Letter.pdf (135 KB)Publication Type: Regulatory Filing
7/9/2007
NCTA Comments 07/09/07Email this Document
Abstract: NCTA Comments re: Implementation of the Telecommunications Act of 1996: Telecommunications Carriers' Use of Customer Proprietary Network Information and Other Customer Information; IP-Enabled Services, opposing the adoption of any new CPNI requirements; CC Docket No. 96-115 and WC Docket No. 04-36Attachment: 070907 96-115_04-36 CPNI comments.pdf (20 KB)Publication Type: Regulatory Filing
6/15/2007
NCTA Reply Comments 06/15/07 Email this Document
Abstract: NCTA Reply Comments re: Interior Telephone Company, Inc. Petition for Declaratory Ruling on the Scope of the Duty of a Rural Local Exchange Carrier to Provide Interim Interconnection, urging the FCC to deny the requested ruling and clarify that Section 51.715 requires Interior to provide GCI with an interconnection arrangement; WC Docket No. 07-102Attachment: 061507 07-102 Replies.pdf (25 KB)Publication Type: Regulatory Filing
2/1/2007
NCTA Reply Comments 02/01/07Email this Document
Abstract: NCTA Reply Comments re: Developing a Unified Intercarrier Compensation Regime, arguing that the Missoula Plan would not achieve the objectives identified by the FCC and should not be adopted; CC Docket No. 01-92Attachment: 020107 01-92 Reply Comments.pdf (48 KB)Publication Type: Regulatory Filing
1/22/2007
NCTA Opposition 01/22/07Email this Document
Abstract: NCTA Opposition re Freedom of Information Act Requests For Network Outage Reporting Information, objecting to the release of the information requested in referenced FOIA requests; FOIA Control Nos. [various]Attachment: 012207 FOIA Opposition.pdf (26 KB)Publication Type: Regulatory Filing
12/7/2006
NCTA Comments 12/07/06Email this Document
Abstract: NCTA Comments re: Developing a Unified Intercarrier Compensation Regime, arguing that the FCC should not adopt the phantom traffic proposal submitted by the Missoula Plan proponents; CC Docket No. 01-92 Attachment: 120706 01-92 phantom traffic comments.pdf (33 KB)Publication Type: Regulatory Filing
10/25/2006
NCTA Comments 10/25/06Email this Document
Abstract: NCTA Comments re: Developing a Unified Intercarrier Compensation Regime, arguing that the Missoula Plan does not meet any of the key goals of the Commission identified in connection with intercarrier compensation reform, CC Docket No. 01-92Attachment: 102506 01-92 COMMENTS.pdf (95 KB)Publication Type: Regulatory Filing
4/25/2006
NCTA Replies 04/25/06Email this Document
Abstract: NCTA Replies re: Petition of Time Warner Cable for Declaratory Ruling That Competitive Local Exchange Carriers May Obtain Interconnection Under Section 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, to Provide Wholesale Telecommunications Services to VoIP Providers, urging the FCC to grant TWC's two petitions; WC Docket No. 06-55Attachment: 042506_06-55_replies.pdf (41 KB)Publication Type: Regulatory Filing
4/10/2006
NCTA Comments 04/10/06Email this Document
Abstract: NCTA Comments re: Petition of Time Warner Cable for Declaratory Ruling That Competitive Local Exchange Carriers May Obtain Interconnection Under Section 251 of the Communications Act of 1934, as Amended, to Provide Wholesale Telecommunications Services to VoIP Providers, supporting TWC and urging the FCC to remove roadblocks to the widespread depl...Attachment: 041006_06-55_comments.pdf (28 KB)Publication Type: Regulatory Filing
10/21/2005
NCTA Letter 10/21/05Email this Document
Abstract: NCTA Letter re: E911 Requirements for IP-Enabled Service Providers, expressing concern over how ILECs are describing cable's voice services in advertisements and letters; WC Docket No. 05-196Attachment: 102105_05-196_Navin.pdf (398 KB)Publication Type: Regulatory Filing
9/12/2005
NCTA Reply Comments 09/12/05Email this Document
Abstract: NCTA Reply Comments re: E911 Requirements for IP-Enabled Service Providers, arguing that it is 1) premature for the FCC to endorse a single ALI technical solution and 2) cable VoIP providers and alarm companies should be permitted to develop working relationships free of regulatory oversight; WC Docket No. 05-196.Attachment: 091205_05-196_replies.pdf (317 KB)Publication Type: Regulatory Filing
11/1/2004
NCTA Ex Parte 11/01/04Email this Document
Abstract: NCTA Ex Parte re: IP-Enabled Servicesstating VoIP services have integral interstate components that cannot be separated from any intrastate components; WC Docket No. 04-36.Attachment: 110104_04-36_03-211_rogovin_exparte.pdf (526 KB)Publication Type: Regulatory Filing
7/14/2004
NCTA Reply Comments 07/14/04Email this Document
Abstract: NCTA Reply Comments re: IP-Enabled Services, urging the FCC to adopt the minimum regulatory regime for IP-based voice services; WC Docket No. 04-36.Attachment: 071404_04-36_Replies.pdf (195 KB)Publication Type: Regulatory Filing
5/28/2004
NCTA Comments 05/28/04Email this Document
Abstract: NCTA Comments re: IP-Enabled Services, saying that the FCC should encourage innovation, conserve regulatory resources, derive the greatest public benefits and provide the certainty in the marketplace that investors need in order to support the deployment of facilities-based VoIP services; WC Docket No. 04-36.Attachment: 052804 04-36 comments.pdf (130 KB)Publication Type: Regulatory Filing